ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Luisa F. Hansen, Calvin Wong, Ted T. Komoto, Bertram A. Pohl, Eugene Goldberg, Robert J. Howerton, Walter M. Webster
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 72 | Number 1 | October 1979 | Pages 35-51
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE79-A19307
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron and gamma-ray leakage spectra from pulsed spheres having a radius equal to 1.0 mean-free-path (mfp) for 14-MeV neutrons in 232Th, 235U (with radii of 0.7 and 1.5 mfp), 228U (with radii of 0.8 and 2.8 mfp), and 239Pu (with radii of 0.7 and 1.25 mfp) were measured by using time-of-flight techniques. The neutron spectra were measured between 0.9 and 15 MeV using stilbene and NE-213 scintillators. For the gamma rays, the electron recoil spectra were measured between 0.35 and 8 MeV with the NE-213 detector only. Pulse-shape discrimination and flight paths of ∼10 m were used in these measurements. The measured spectra are compared with calculations carried out with TARTNP, a coupled neutron-photon Monte Carlo transport code. The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory ENDL (neutron and photon cross sections) and ENDF/B-IV libraries were used in these calculations. In the region between 10 and 15 MeV, the calculated neutron spectra are in good agreement with the measurements (±5%). The maximum discrepancy observed for the neutrons between 0.9 and 10 MeV is 30%. The notable exception is 232Th, where calculations carried out with the ENDF/B-IV underestimate by a factor of 2 the neutron emission between 5 and 10 MeV. The gamma-ray emission calculations were carried out only with ENDL because of its overall better representation of the neutron measurements; ENDL overestimates the gamma-ray production, with discrepancies ranging between 5 and 20%. However, use of the measured detector efficiency would reduce the maximum discrepancy to <13%. To facilitate the use of the neutron data for calculational purposes by other laboratories, an “experimental” one-dimensional neutron energy spectrum is given for each measurement.