ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DNFSB spots possible bottleneck in Hanford’s waste vitrification
Workers change out spent 27,000-pound TSCR filter columns and place them on a nearby storage pad during a planned outage in 2023. (Photo: DOE)
While the Department of Energy recently celebrated the beginning of hot commissioning of the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which has begun immobilizing the site’s radioactive tank waste in glass through vitrification, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has reported a possible bottleneck in waste processing. According to the DNFSB, unless current systems run efficiently, the issue could result in the interruption of operations at the WTP’s Low-Activity Waste Facility, where waste vitrification takes place.
During operations, the LAW Facility will process an average of 5,300 gallons of tank waste per day, according to Bechtel, the contractor leading design, construction, and commissioning of the WTP. That waste is piped to the facility after being treated by Hanford’s Tanks Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which filters undissolved solid material and removes cesium from liquid waste.
According to a November 7 activity report by the DNFSB, the TSCR system may not be able to produce waste feed fast enough to keep up with the LAW Facility’s vitrification rate.
Yasuki Kowata, Nobuo Fukumura
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 127 | Number 1 | September 1997 | Pages 89-103
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A1923
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Plutonium fuel could be utilized in the entire core of a heavy water-moderated, boiling light water-cooled pressure-tube-type reactor (HWR). The coolant void reactivity, however, depends on the various parameters of the lattice. It is especially significant to clarify the effect of plutonium nuclides on the void reactivity.The void reactivities in the infinite HWR lattices have been parametrically analyzed to clarify the effects of changes in the lattice parameters on the void reactivity using the WIMS-D4 code with the JENDL-3.1 nuclear data. At present, it is known that the behavior of the void reactivity can be clarified by separating the components of fuel nuclides, neutron cross sections, energy groups, and regions in the lattice cell from the global reactivity effect, using the important reaction rates.If the fuels are the same in the macroscopic absorption cross section for the 2200 m/s neutron, it has been shown that the void reactivity shifts further to a negative direction in a narrower pitch lattice and in the plutonium-fueled lattice with a higher content of 239Pu rather than in the uranium one. The effect of reducing the void reactivity to the negative by fissile plutonium is caused mainly by the presence of the resonance cross section at ~0.3 eV of 239Pu. The higher the content of 239Pu, the less the recovery of dipped neutron flux within the resonance energy width due to a decrease in the thermal neutron scattering of hydrogen with an increase in coolant void fraction, so that the decreased resonance fission rate for 239Pu contributes to the more negative direction for the void reactivity.On the other hand, resonance at ~0.3 eV for 241Pu does not have an important role for the void reactivity because its resonance cross section is smaller than that of 239Pu.
