ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
Yasuki Kowata, Nobuo Fukumura
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 127 | Number 1 | September 1997 | Pages 89-103
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A1923
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Plutonium fuel could be utilized in the entire core of a heavy water-moderated, boiling light water-cooled pressure-tube-type reactor (HWR). The coolant void reactivity, however, depends on the various parameters of the lattice. It is especially significant to clarify the effect of plutonium nuclides on the void reactivity.The void reactivities in the infinite HWR lattices have been parametrically analyzed to clarify the effects of changes in the lattice parameters on the void reactivity using the WIMS-D4 code with the JENDL-3.1 nuclear data. At present, it is known that the behavior of the void reactivity can be clarified by separating the components of fuel nuclides, neutron cross sections, energy groups, and regions in the lattice cell from the global reactivity effect, using the important reaction rates.If the fuels are the same in the macroscopic absorption cross section for the 2200 m/s neutron, it has been shown that the void reactivity shifts further to a negative direction in a narrower pitch lattice and in the plutonium-fueled lattice with a higher content of 239Pu rather than in the uranium one. The effect of reducing the void reactivity to the negative by fissile plutonium is caused mainly by the presence of the resonance cross section at ~0.3 eV of 239Pu. The higher the content of 239Pu, the less the recovery of dipped neutron flux within the resonance energy width due to a decrease in the thermal neutron scattering of hydrogen with an increase in coolant void fraction, so that the decreased resonance fission rate for 239Pu contributes to the more negative direction for the void reactivity.On the other hand, resonance at ~0.3 eV for 241Pu does not have an important role for the void reactivity because its resonance cross section is smaller than that of 239Pu.
