ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
J. V. Muralidhar Rao, S. M. Lee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 82 | Number 1 | September 1982 | Pages 71-77
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A19029
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The homogenized neutron diffusion equation for Benoist’s uncorrected diffusion coefficients is derived. The approximations in the asymptotic and buckling methods are analyzed to show that both these methods are identical and that Benoist’s corrected diffusion coefficients should not be used in the diffusion equation. Furthermore, the practical limitations of the homogenization methods are discussed, and it is pointed out that the use of Benoist’s uncorrected coefficients in the diffusion equation may be superior to the use of the coefficients of Larsen or of Deniz and Gelbard. It is also recommended, in view of the severe approximations made in the transport theory to arrive at the homogenization prescriptions, that the accuracy in the results of the homogenization methods should be examined for a few benchmarks in slab geometry which are amenable to transport theory solution.
