ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
J. J. Volpe, J. Hardy, Jr., D. Klein
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 1 | April 1970 | Pages 116-127
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A18883
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thermal disadvantage factors and spectral indexes have been measured in a variety of light-water-moderated lattices. One series contained slightly enriched uranium rods in hexagonal geometry and another series used natural-uranium fuel in slab geometry. The detectors used were 164Dy, 176Lu, and 239Pu. Full energy range (0 to 10 MeV) Monte Carlo calculations with explicit cell-geometry representations were performed using the RECAP program. In addition, thermal energy range (0 to 0.625 eV) calculations were obtained with the Monte Carlo program MARC as well as with the integral transport-theory-code THERMOS. The purpose of these investigations was to test the adequacy of the various water scattering kernels—Nelkin, Koppel, and Haywood—for a broad range of thermal-flux characteristics: from a soft moderator spectrum with a steep spatial gradient to a very hard spectrum which was relatively flat as a function of position. The conclusions obtained were as follows. Calculated spectral indexes using the Haywood kernel were 2 to 3% higher than experiment, on the average, in the fuel region of these cells. Use of the Koppel kernel removed most of this disagreement in the case of 176Lu but the comparison for 239Pu remained unchanged. On the basis of these results, the thermal-flux spectrum obtained with the Haywood model appears to be slightly too hard. With regard to the disadvantage factors, good agreement was generally obtained between theory and measurement except for the tightest lattices. The calculated disadvantage factors were found to be insensitive to the kernel model selected. The effects from including thermal-scattering-pattern treatments above P1 as well as a spatially dependent and anisotropic source-to-thermal description were found to be small in these cells, < 2%.