ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Who’s in the running for DOE Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses?
Today is the Department of Energy’s deadline for states to respond to a request for information on proposed Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. Issued on January 28, the RFI marks the first step toward potentially establishing voluntary federal-state partnerships designed to build a coherent, end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle strategy for the country, including waste management, according to the DOE.
Ricardo Artigas, H. E. Hungerford
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 36 | Number 3 | June 1969 | Pages 295-303
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE69-A18727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Expressions for the neutron flux at the exit of a cylindrical duct of radius δ and length l (with λ = δ2/l2), have been found by the use of the albedo concept and by the method of single-collision sources in the duct wall, based on monoenergetic integral transport theory. In contrast with other methods of solution, the isotropic area source of radius δ at the duct entrance is not approximated by a point source, and the numerical evaluation of integrals does not impose restrictions on the values of λ. Calculation of the neutron flux at the duct exit is expedited by the use of the tables given, which are a function of the duct geometry and were generated from the numerical evaluation of the integrals that appear in the expressions for the flux. Comparison of the results as predicted by the formulas developed in this paper and those predicted by already existing formulas with the results of a stochastic neutron-transport code indicates that the formulas developed here are always in better agreement with the results of the code. For values of λ < 1, the formulas developed here differ by a maximum of ± 10%, while the existing formulas differ by a maximum of more than 100%.