ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
S. K. Wallace, K. R. Teare, and J. B. Green
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 25 | Number 4 | August 1966 | Pages 407-412
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18561
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper discusses the validity of the pulsed-neutron experiments frequently used for checking core-shutdown calculations. The analysis of the experimental methods is based on energy-dependent diffusion theory, since this, in its few-group form, is the usual core-design model. It is shown that the comparison of experimental and theoretical values of the fundamental-mode prompt decay constant is a valid check, but the Garelis and Russell method is subject to severe limitations. We show that certain assumptions must be made to deduce the Garelis and Russell equation and recommend that the experimenter check the extent to which these assumptions are violated before he attempts to use the Garelis and Russell method.