ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
New laws offer nuclear industry incentives for existing power plant uprates
This year, the U.S. nuclear industry received a much-needed economic boost that could help preserve operating nuclear power plants and incentivize upgrades that extend their lifespan and power output.
Signed into law in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act offers production tax credits (PTCs) for existing nuclear power plants and either PTCs or investment tax credits (ITCs) for new carbon-free generation. These credits could make power uprates—increasing the maximum power level at which a commercial plant may operate—a much more appealing option for utilities.
A. Natarajan, K. V. Subbaiah, D. V. Gopinath
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 85 | Number 4 | December 1983 | Pages 418-422
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A18387
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Significant differences have been observed between Goldstein and Wilkins (moments method) and ASFIT (anisotropic source flux iteration technique) buildup factors in the materials of high atomic number (Z) for 6- and 8-MeV gamma rays at depths greater than 10 mfp. Comparison has been made between the two, and quantitative differences are presented for tin, tungsten, lead, and uranium in the gamma-ray energy range of 3 to 10 MeV up to a depth of 20 mfp. It is believed that these large differences are a sequel to certain deficiencies in the Goldstein and Wilkins method of reconstructing the spatial distribution of the scattered flux in these cases. The closer agreement between the modified moments method values and the present results is cited.
