ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Researchers use one-of-a-kind expertise and capabilities to test fuels of tomorrow
At the Idaho National Laboratory Hot Fuel Examination Facility, containment box operator Jake Maupin moves a manipulator arm into position around a pencil-thin nuclear fuel rod. He is preparing for a procedure that he and his colleagues have practiced repeatedly in anticipation of this moment in the hot cell.
W. L. Whittemore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 18 | Number 2 | February 1964 | Pages 182-188
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A18317
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Atomic neutron-velocity selector has been used at the electron linear accelerator to study the inelastic scattering by liquid methane and liquid parahydrogen of monoenergetic neutrons with incident energies in the range 0.009 to 0.17 eV. The energy dependence of the total cross sections and the neutron spectra produced by specimens of these materials have also been measured. The inelastic scattering of slow neutrons (< 0.010 eV) at 90° by liquid parahydrogen appears to be smaller than expected on the basis of the measured total cross section and the angular dependence calculated by Sarma. Perhaps this is related to the fact that the total cross section is larger than for freely rotating molecules, indicating the possible existence of some hindrance to molecular motion. The slowing-down power, σnE0/E, a quantitative measure of the neutron-moderating ability, is evaluated from the measured inelastic neutron-scattering data and compared for various neutron energies for the two liquids. A consideration of the various data leads to the conclusion (1) that solid methane is better than liquid parahydrogen for production of very “cold” neutrons (E0 < 0.007 eV), and (2) that parahydrogen is superior to liquid methane for production of cold neutrons with E0 < 0.005 eV.