ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
W. R. Gambill, R. D. Bundy
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 18 | Number 1 | January 1964 | Pages 80-89
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A18142
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Twenty-nine experimental determinations of burnout heat flux were made with water flowing by natural circulation through electrically heated vertical tubes with and without internal twisted tapes and through rectangular cross sections of three aspect ratios. Heated lengths varied from 10 to 33 in., system pressure at the test-section flow exit from 14.7 to 26.3 lb/in.2abs, inlet subcooling from 36 to 170 F, and burnout heat flux from 13,000 to 218,500 Btu/h·ft2. Tests were made with both unrestricted and restricted return flow paths. Three correlations were developed for predicting natural-circulation burnout heat fluxes for such conditions. Two are useful for rapid estimation, but the third involves a more fundamental assessment of the coolant-mass velocity at burnout by a graphical matching of the heat flux which a given flow rate can sustain to the heat flux which will produce that flow rate. For all the data, this approach gave average and maximum deviations of 15% and 38%, respectively. It has been found that use of a slip ratio of unity is adequate for burnout prediction, and the reasons for this are discussed in detail. The small burnout penalty incurred by a substantial restriction of return flow path, experimentally observed, is in accord with the theoretical model.