ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
William G. Davey
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 26-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new activation technique has been developed for the measurement of the ratio of the capture cross section of 238U and the fission cross section of 235U in zero-energy fast reactors. This work was initiated because of the long-standing discrepancy between calculated values of this ratio and radio-chemically measured values. The new technique is a direct counting method that does not involve chemical separation in any way. Measurements have been made in four Z PR-III fast reactor assemblies, two with hard spectra and two with soft spectra. In all four cases the measured ratio was slightly higher than the calculated value being, on the average, 4% higher than calculation. This is in strong contrast with the past radiochemical measurements in Z PR-U3 assemblies that gave values 16% less than calculation. The present measurements, therefore, support the general correctness of the calculated ratio and, hence, indicate that there are no gross errors in the assumed average microscopic values of the 238U capture cross section and the 235 U fission cross section.