ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Creekstone Energy taps EnergySolutions to study nuclear-powered data center
Utah-based Creekstone Energy has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with EnergySolutions to study the feasibility of building at least 2 gigawatts of advanced nuclear capacity to power a 25-acre data center Creekstone is planning in Delta, Utah.
William G. Davey
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 26-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new activation technique has been developed for the measurement of the ratio of the capture cross section of 238U and the fission cross section of 235U in zero-energy fast reactors. This work was initiated because of the long-standing discrepancy between calculated values of this ratio and radio-chemically measured values. The new technique is a direct counting method that does not involve chemical separation in any way. Measurements have been made in four Z PR-III fast reactor assemblies, two with hard spectra and two with soft spectra. In all four cases the measured ratio was slightly higher than the calculated value being, on the average, 4% higher than calculation. This is in strong contrast with the past radiochemical measurements in Z PR-U3 assemblies that gave values 16% less than calculation. The present measurements, therefore, support the general correctness of the calculated ratio and, hence, indicate that there are no gross errors in the assumed average microscopic values of the 238U capture cross section and the 235 U fission cross section.