ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Prepare for the 2025 Nuclear PE Exam with ANS guides
The next opportunity to earn professional engineer (PE) licensure in nuclear engineering is this fall, and now is the time to sign up and begin studying with the help of materials like the online module program offered by the American Nuclear Society.
Frederick G. Hammitt, M. John Robinson, and J. F. Lafferty
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 29 | Number 1 | July 1967 | Pages 131-142
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A17815
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two theoretical models to predict axial pressure distribution, void fraction, and velocity in a cavitating venturi are applied. The theoretical predictions are compared with experimental data from cold-water and mercury tests, and good agreement for the pressure profiles is found. The predicted void fractions are found to be too high, probably because the models assume zero slip or negative slip between the vapor and liquid phases. The analogy between the cavitating venturi and other choked-flow regimes is explored. One of the theoretical models used is based on the assumption that the cavitating venturi is essentially entirely analogous to a deLaval nozzle operating in a choked-flow regime with a compressible gas. The cavitating venturi is an example of an extremely low quality two-phase choked flow device. The present study is thus somewhat applicable to the study of liquid-cooled nuclear reactor pressure vessel or piping ruptures, which have received considerable attention in recent years. However, the qualities encountered in the present cavitation case are an order of magnitude lower than those usually considered for the reactor safety analyses, so that the present study is a limiting case for these.