ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
F. Käppeler, K. Wisshak, L. D. Hong
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 84 | Number 3 | July 1983 | Pages 234-247
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A17792
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron capture cross sections of 56Fe and 58Fe have been measured in the energy range from 10 to 250 keV relative to the gold standard. A pulsed 3-MV Van de Graaff accelerator and the 7Li(p,n) reaction served as a neutron source. Capture gamma rays were detected by two C6D6 detectors, which were operated in coincidence and anticoincidence modes. Two-dimensional data acquisition allowed the offline application of the pulse height weighting technique. The samples were located at a 60-cm flight path. The total time resolution was 1.2 ns allowing an energy resolution of 2 ns/m. The experimental setup was optimized with respect to low background and low neutron sensitivity. The additional 4-cm flight path from the sample to the detector was sufficient to discriminate against the capture of sample scattered neutrons by the additional time of flight. In this way reliable results were obtained even for the strong s-wave resonances of both isotopes. The experimental capture yield was analyzed with the FANAC code. The energy resolution allowed extraction of resonance parameters in the energy range from 10 to 100 keV. Individual systematic uncertainties were found to range between 5 and 10% while the statistical uncertainty is 3 to 5% for most resonances. A comparison to other results exhibits systematic differences of 7 to 11% for 56Fe. The present results for 58Fe differ up to 50% from the only other measurement for this isotope.