ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NNSA awards BWXT $1.5B defense fuels contract
The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration has awarded BWX Technologies a contract valued at $1.5 billion to build a Domestic Uranium Enrichment Centrifuge Experiment (DUECE) pilot plant in Tennessee in support of the administration’s efforts to build out a domestic supply of unobligated enriched uranium for defense-related nuclear fuel.
J. Hirota, M. Nakano, S. Iijima, K. Shirakata
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 87 | Number 3 | July 1984 | Pages 252-261
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A17781
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experimental study of the heterogeneous liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core has been made using FCA VII-3 assemblies of an axially heterogeneous configuration. The internal blankets inserted in these assemblies differed in composition, arrangement, and thickness. The analysis was carried out using the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Fast Set Version II and the diffusion code in R-Z geometry. The S4 calculation was made to evaluate the transport effects. Comparison between the calculated and experimental results reveals that the eigenvalue and the plutonium sample worth in the core are underestimated for the heterogeneous assembly, although they are well represented for the homogeneous assembly. The 238U capture rate is underestimated in the internal blanket relative to the core of the heterogeneous assembly. Further study is needed to solve the inconsistent prediction of the sodium-void worth observed between the heterogeneous and homogeneous assemblies.