ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The RAIN scale: A good intention that falls short
Radiation protection specialists agree that clear communication of radiation risks remains a vexing challenge that cannot be solved solely by finding new ways to convey technical information.
Earlier this year, an article in Nuclear News described a new radiation risk communication tool, known as the Radiation Index, or, RAIN (“Let it RAIN: A new approach to radiation communication,” NN, Jan. 2025, p. 36). The authors of the article created the RAIN scale to improve radiation risk communication to the general public who are not well-versed in important aspects of radiation exposures, including radiation dose quantities, units, and values; associated health consequences; and the benefits derived from radiation exposures.
A. Goldfeld, A. Tsechanski, and G. Shani
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 90 | Number 3 | July 1985 | Pages 330-340
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE85-A17774
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Different concepts of integral experiments for fusion blanket neutronics are investigated. The first is with the neutron source (tritium target of a neutron generator) located inside of or in immediate proximity to the stack of blanket materials under consideration. The second is based on irradiation of the stack by means of a collimated and, therefore, monoenergetic T(d, n)4He neutron beam with a tritium target placed outside the stack. The comparison between the different concepts is carried out by means of the Monte Carlo transport code MCNP with continuous energy treatment. The comparison between the two approaches reveals that the integral experiments with a collimated monoenergetic T(d,n)4He neutron beam result in a neutron spectrum that is better correlated with the details of elastic and inelastic scattering to the first level of the material's nuclei than the one with a neutron source inside a stack. In the case of a collimated neutron beam, there is a clearer separation between energy regions of different neutron interactions and, therefore, the source of discrepancies between measurement and calculation can be identified more easily and corrected by a proper treatment of the cross sections of the specified nuclear reactions.
