ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
X-energy forms partnership with Talen Energy to assess Xe-100 deployment
X-energy announced Thursday that it has signed a letter of intent with Talen Energy to assess the deployment of X-energy’s Xe-100 reactor in Pennsylvania and throughout the market area of the PJM Interconnection regional transmission organization. That area, where the companies intend to explore the deployment of at least three four-unit Xe-100 power plants, includes several states in the eastern United States, from New Jersey to Illinois.
A. Goldfeld, A. Tsechanski, and G. Shani
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 90 | Number 3 | July 1985 | Pages 330-340
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE85-A17774
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Different concepts of integral experiments for fusion blanket neutronics are investigated. The first is with the neutron source (tritium target of a neutron generator) located inside of or in immediate proximity to the stack of blanket materials under consideration. The second is based on irradiation of the stack by means of a collimated and, therefore, monoenergetic T(d, n)4He neutron beam with a tritium target placed outside the stack. The comparison between the different concepts is carried out by means of the Monte Carlo transport code MCNP with continuous energy treatment. The comparison between the two approaches reveals that the integral experiments with a collimated monoenergetic T(d,n)4He neutron beam result in a neutron spectrum that is better correlated with the details of elastic and inelastic scattering to the first level of the material's nuclei than the one with a neutron source inside a stack. In the case of a collimated neutron beam, there is a clearer separation between energy regions of different neutron interactions and, therefore, the source of discrepancies between measurement and calculation can be identified more easily and corrected by a proper treatment of the cross sections of the specified nuclear reactions.