ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Panelists discuss U.S. path to criticality in ANS webinar
The American Nuclear Society recently hosted a panel discussion featuring prominent figures from the nuclear sector who discussed the industry’s ongoing push for criticality.
Yasir Arafat, chief technical officer of Aalo Atomics; Jordan Bramble, CEO of Antares Nuclear; and Rita Baranwal, chief nuclear officer of Radiant Industries, participated in the discussion and covered their recent progress in the Department of Energy’s Reactor Pilot Program. Nader Satvat, director of nuclear systems design at Kairos Power, gave an update on the company’s ongoing demonstration projects taking place outside of the landscape of DOE authorization.
Martin Becker
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 31 | Number 3 | March 1968 | Pages 458-464
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A17588
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The most general current formulations of the point reactor kinetics equations permit the flux shape function to be time dependent. This permissibility has led to the development of a class of space-time analyses referred to as adiabatic or quasistatic. The use of time-independent importance weighting, however, can lead to difficulties, as is shown in an example. In this paper, point kinetics equations are derived from a variational principle in such a way as to permit time-dependent importance shape functions. “Extra” terms due to the explicit time dependence of the shape functions appear, and normalization conditions are obtained by which these terms can be eliminated. Additional differences from conventional form appear if one chooses to use different importance shape functions for flux and precursor equations, but these differences can be neglected for many cases of practical interest.