ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Illinois legislature lifts ban on nuclear energy, funds clean energy
The Illinois General Assembly passed a clean energy bill on October 30 that would, in part, lift a 30-year moratorium on new nuclear energy in the state and create incentives for more energy storage.
John C. Vigil
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 29 | Number 3 | September 1967 | Pages 392-401
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE29-03-392
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method based on analytic continuation, which is well suited for fast digital computer application, has been applied to the point reactor kinetics equations. The most important characteristic of the method is that it yields an analytic criterion for the magnitude of the time step. This criterion is such that the time step automatically expands or contracts, depending on the behavior of the function within each interval. The use of this criterion to determine the time step guarantees that the fractional error in the results increases, at most, linearly with the number of time steps. Furthermore, the magnitude of the time step determined from this criterion can be much larger than the prompt-neutron generation time. Approximate solutions by this method were compared with some analytic solutions to the reactor kinetics equations, and the error accumulation was found, in all cases, to be within the limits predicted by the theory. Comparisons were also made with experimental transients in the Godiva and SPERT I reactors. The approximate results were found to agree well with experiment in the range of reactivity inputs where the feedback model used is valid. In a comparison with another numerical method (RTS code), analytic continuation was found to be 25 times faster.