ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Who’s in the running for DOE Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses?
Today is the Department of Energy’s deadline for states to respond to a request for information on proposed Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. Issued on January 28, the RFI marks the first step toward potentially establishing voluntary federal-state partnerships designed to build a coherent, end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle strategy for the country, including waste management, according to the DOE.
John C. Vigil
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 29 | Number 3 | September 1967 | Pages 392-401
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE29-03-392
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method based on analytic continuation, which is well suited for fast digital computer application, has been applied to the point reactor kinetics equations. The most important characteristic of the method is that it yields an analytic criterion for the magnitude of the time step. This criterion is such that the time step automatically expands or contracts, depending on the behavior of the function within each interval. The use of this criterion to determine the time step guarantees that the fractional error in the results increases, at most, linearly with the number of time steps. Furthermore, the magnitude of the time step determined from this criterion can be much larger than the prompt-neutron generation time. Approximate solutions by this method were compared with some analytic solutions to the reactor kinetics equations, and the error accumulation was found, in all cases, to be within the limits predicted by the theory. Comparisons were also made with experimental transients in the Godiva and SPERT I reactors. The approximate results were found to agree well with experiment in the range of reactivity inputs where the feedback model used is valid. In a comparison with another numerical method (RTS code), analytic continuation was found to be 25 times faster.