ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
New laws offer nuclear industry incentives for existing power plant uprates
This year, the U.S. nuclear industry received a much-needed economic boost that could help preserve operating nuclear power plants and incentivize upgrades that extend their lifespan and power output.
Signed into law in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act offers production tax credits (PTCs) for existing nuclear power plants and either PTCs or investment tax credits (ITCs) for new carbon-free generation. These credits could make power uprates—increasing the maximum power level at which a commercial plant may operate—a much more appealing option for utilities.
E. Johansson, E. Jonsson, M. Lindberg, and J. Mednis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 26 | Number 1 | September 1966 | Pages 47-58
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A17186
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We have carried out some experiments and calculations on the neutron spectrum in a UO2 tube at various temperatures., The tube, 65.6-mm o.d., 32.3-mm i.d., and 300-mm high, was canned in steel and mounted in a container which was placed in the central vertical channel of the reactor Rl. The tube was heated by the fission energy which was enough to keep it at a maximum temperature of 750°C. The lowest temperature was 50°C., With the fast chopper, we measured the spectrum from a lead scatterer in the center of the tube. By multiplying this spectrum with some correction factors, we got the spectrum in the scatterer, which is the final result from the measurements., The increase of the temperature from 50 to 750°C gave an appreciable hardening of the neutron spectrum. This hardening will increase the reaction rate in 239Pu by 7.5% if one normalizes to equal reaction rate in a l/v absorber. Only a minor part of the value 7.5% depends on the heating of the steel and the lead., In the calculations we used the THERMOS code with the effective-width model for deuterium. All other materials, including U02, were treated with the free-gas model. The energy ranged from 0.00025 to 3.06 eV., The experimental and computed spectra agreed reasonably well in the thermal region both at 50 and at 750°C. The calculated epithermal ratio and, to some extent, the spectrum in the joining region were sensitive to the value of the cell radius used in the calculations. So it is difficult to make a definite statement about the computational method for these energies. We have, however, no reason to suspect that the method would produce wrong results., The ratio between the high-temperature spectrum and the low-temperature spectrum appeared to be rather insensitive to the value of the cell radius even for epithermal energies, and we found a remarkable agreement with the measured ratio. Therefore, we had no reason to replace the free-gas model for UO2 by some other model - although the free-gas model is, of course, somewhat unphysi-cal., Some THERMOS calculations were also made on the influence of hot steel and hot lead and on the influence of elevated moderator-temperature - 220°C instead of the value 33°C used in the experiments.,