ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
NRC to conduct environmental review of Orano’s Project Ike enrichment facility
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is to prepare an environmental impact statement in its review of Orano Enrichment’s license application to build and operate a new uranium enrichment facility near Oak Ridge, Tenn., and is asking the public for comments on the scope of its environmental review.
Charles N. Kelber, Philip H. Kier
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 4 | April 1966 | Pages 389-393
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A16409
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As suggested by Brissenden, it is possible to analyze the reaction rate in the unresolved resonance region by generating sets of random resonance parameters that have the correct statistical properties. Since each set of parameters is itself a random variable, an estimate of the probable error in an average-group cross section or reaction rate can be made by averaging over many random sets. This we have done for a mixture representative of fast breeder reactors and for the energy range 700 to 900 eV. This region is a typical one for studying the Doppler effect. If we make the assumption (a great oversimplification) that the response in this small energy band is typical, not only for the mean but also for the variance, then we would conclude that, if all fine groups (of width 200 eV) have the same weight, the probable error in the fissile component of the Doppler coefficient is about equal to its mean value. For the fine group itself, the probable error in the difference in the relative changes of the fission and the absorption rates is about ten times the mean value.