ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Hash Hashemian: Visionary leadership
As Dr. Hashem M. “Hash” Hashemian prepares to step into his term as President of the American Nuclear Society, he is clear that he wants to make the most of this unique moment.
A groundswell in public approval of nuclear is finding a home in growing governmental support that is backed by a tailwind of technological innovation. “Now is a good time to be in nuclear,” Hashemian said, as he explained the criticality of this moment and what he hoped to accomplish as president.
George H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 4 | April 1966 | Pages 322-331
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A16400
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analysis of a parallel-plate UO2-fueled Fission Electric Cell is developed that includes a detailed treatment of the fission-fragment initial-energy spectrum, energy-charge loss during slowing, and energy dependence of the total range. The treatment of fragment transport is based, as much as possible, on correlations of experimental data. However, available data are skimpy, and several discrepancies, e.g., between available differential and integral energy-loss data, are noted. The importance of an accurate fragment transport model is demonstrated by the differences in efficiencies obtained from this detailed treatment, as opposed to earlier calculations that used simpler models, e.g., relative differences between models of as much as 15 and 80% are attributed to the treatment of the fragment charge and energy loss, respectively. The calculations are also shown to be fairly sensitive to the total-range-mass correlation, but only weakly dependent on the choice of the initial fragment charge. While efficiencies for the parallel-plate cell with reasonable fuel-layer thickness are found to range from 2 to 10%, efficiencies for cylindrical or spherical geometry may be 5 to 6 times this, and the concept may be competitive for certain specialized applications.