ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
R. Ofek, M. Segev
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 4 | August 1992 | Pages 319-344
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A15482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An approach is summarized for developing a full analytical method for the generation of laboratory (lab) coordinate system multigroup transfer cross sections of elastic and discrete-level inelastic scatterings of neutrons, where the angular distribution data of the scattered neutrons are given as coefficients of truncated Legendre polynomial expansions in the center-of-mass (c.m.) coordinate system. In the “kernel form”of the multigroup approximation, fluxes, cross sections, and angular data are left outside the integration signs of the transfer cross-section expression. Then, the integrand is a four-index kernel- the source and sink energy groups and the Legendre polynomials in the c.m. and lab systems each contributing one index—integrated over the source and sink groups. In the method introduced, the double integration on the neutron pre- and postscattering energies, in these two groups, is carried out analytically. This is done by decomposing the Legendre polynomials in the integrand into their representations as polynomials of their arguments—the cosines of the angle of scattering in the lab and the c.m. systems. It is assumed that the flux is presented as a simple function of the neutron prescattering energy. The first integration takes place between the cosines of scattering in the c.m. system related by the kinematics of scattering to the energy boundaries of the sink group, while the second integration takes place between the energy boundaries of the source group. Transfer cross sections of discrete-level inelastic scatterings are evaluated quite similarly to those of elastic scatterings. The only difference is in the integration over the prescattering energies, which stems from the replacement of the mass number of the scattering nucleus, appearing in the expression for the cosine of scattering in the lab system, by an energy-dependent “effective mass number ”in the case of inelastic scattering. The method of evaluation described seems to be fast and accurate and is valid theoretically up to any order of Legendre expansions desired. Some evaluations made with this method, for both elastic and discrete-level inelastic scatterings, are compared with numerical computations carried out by other methods: the NJOY cross-section processing code and the method outlined by Hong and Shultis. The flux used as a weighting function is either energy independent or of a 1/E’ form (where E’ is the prescattering energy of the neutron). The results are in good agreement.