ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
GLE gets incentives, draft EIS
The governments of Kentucky and McCracken County have granted preliminary approval to Global Laser Enrichment for a comprehensive incentive package to support the development of the North Carolina–based company’s planned Paducah Laser Enrichment Facility in the western part of the state. The performance-based incentive package would provide as much as $98.9 million in tax incentives and other economic incentives—provided that GLE reaches the required thresholds in investments and job creation.
In addition, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, has completed a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) in response to GLE’s application to construct and operate the PLEF. Members of the public can submit comments on the draft EIS by May 11 for consideration by the NRC.
R. Ofek, M. Segev
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 4 | August 1992 | Pages 319-344
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A15482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An approach is summarized for developing a full analytical method for the generation of laboratory (lab) coordinate system multigroup transfer cross sections of elastic and discrete-level inelastic scatterings of neutrons, where the angular distribution data of the scattered neutrons are given as coefficients of truncated Legendre polynomial expansions in the center-of-mass (c.m.) coordinate system. In the “kernel form”of the multigroup approximation, fluxes, cross sections, and angular data are left outside the integration signs of the transfer cross-section expression. Then, the integrand is a four-index kernel- the source and sink energy groups and the Legendre polynomials in the c.m. and lab systems each contributing one index—integrated over the source and sink groups. In the method introduced, the double integration on the neutron pre- and postscattering energies, in these two groups, is carried out analytically. This is done by decomposing the Legendre polynomials in the integrand into their representations as polynomials of their arguments—the cosines of the angle of scattering in the lab and the c.m. systems. It is assumed that the flux is presented as a simple function of the neutron prescattering energy. The first integration takes place between the cosines of scattering in the c.m. system related by the kinematics of scattering to the energy boundaries of the sink group, while the second integration takes place between the energy boundaries of the source group. Transfer cross sections of discrete-level inelastic scatterings are evaluated quite similarly to those of elastic scatterings. The only difference is in the integration over the prescattering energies, which stems from the replacement of the mass number of the scattering nucleus, appearing in the expression for the cosine of scattering in the lab system, by an energy-dependent “effective mass number ”in the case of inelastic scattering. The method of evaluation described seems to be fast and accurate and is valid theoretically up to any order of Legendre expansions desired. Some evaluations made with this method, for both elastic and discrete-level inelastic scatterings, are compared with numerical computations carried out by other methods: the NJOY cross-section processing code and the method outlined by Hong and Shultis. The flux used as a weighting function is either energy independent or of a 1/E’ form (where E’ is the prescattering energy of the neutron). The results are in good agreement.