ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Santee Cooper opts to reboot Summer reactor project
The board of directors of South Carolina’s state-owned utility Santee Cooper voted today to approve the proposal from Brookfield Asset Management to complete two new AP1000 power reactors at the V.C. Summer site in Jenkinsville, S.C.
Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuo Azekura, Tadahiro Ohnishi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 4 | April 1977 | Pages 709-715
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A15211
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An improved response matrix method has been proposed to effectively take into account the anisotropy of neutron angular distributions. The method utilizes a relation between the P0 and P1 components of a neutron angular distribution instead of calculating them independently. Hence the number of unknowns as well as computing time can be kept about the same as in the conventional response matrix method which adopts an isotropic approximation of a neutron angular distribution. The proposed method has been evaluated by applying it to one-dimensional slab and two-dimensional hexagonal systems. The results are quite promising: In comparison with the reference SN calculation, the difference of the neutron multiplication factor and power distribution is within 0.1% Δk/k and 2%, respectively, and furthermore, the computing time is reduced to below one-third.