ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
My story: Stanley Levinson—ANS member since 1983
Levinson early in his career and today.
As a member of the American Nuclear Society, I have been to many conferences. The International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA ’25), embedded in ANS Annual Meeting in Chicago in June, held special significance for me with the PSA ’25 opening plenary session recognizing the 50th anniversary of the publication of WASH-1400, which helped define my career. Reflecting on that milestone sent me back to 1975, when I was just an undergraduate student studying nuclear engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Troy, N.Y., focusing on my mechanics, fluids, and thermodynamic classes as well as my first set of nuclear engineering classes. At that time—and many times since—the question “Why nuclear engineering?” was raised.
Surendra Mishra , R. S. Modak, S. Ganesan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 170 | Number 3 | March 2012 | Pages 280-289
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE10-84
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Large-sized pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWRs) are neutronically loosely coupled and hence are prone to significant changes in flux shape during operation. As a result, they need a sophisticated regulation procedure based on an online flux mapping system (OFMS). During the reactor operation, neutron flux is continuously measured at certain predetermined in-core locations. The purpose of OFMS is to compute a detailed flux map at all points in the reactor, after every 2 min, by making use of the measured fluxes. The knowledge of detailed flux distribution is then used for an appropriate regulating action. The choice of computational method used by OFMS is of crucial importance because the method is expected to be both efficient and accurate and should work for a range of reactor configurations occurring during the operation. In this paper, three different methods, namely, flux synthesis, internal boundary condition, and combined least squares (CLSQ), are analyzed for their prospective use in the forthcoming 700-MW(electric) Indian PHWR. The CLSQ method is found to be most accurate, although it needs significant computation. A hybrid method that combines certain features of other methods is also studied and seems to give good accuracy with moderate computational effort.