ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Christmas Night
Twas the night before Christmas when all through the houseNo electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged in by the chimney with careWith the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
J. P. Lestone, C. R. Bates, M. B. Chadwick, M. W. Paris
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 80 | Number 1 | October 2024 | Pages S72-S88
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2024.2334973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
While studying d(d,n)3He fusion in 1938, Ruhlig observed protons with energies larger than 15 MeV. Ruhlig suggested that these high-energy protons were generated by tritium-on-deuterium fusion neutrons scattering protons out of a thin cellophane foil placed inside a cloud chamber. This led Ruhlig to hypothesize that he was observing secondary (in-flight) tritium-on-deuterium fusions and conclude that the d(t,n) reaction “must be an exceedingly probable one.” This was the first attempt to quantify the probability of d(t,n) fusion, using the ~1-MeV tritons generated by d(d,p)t fusion. This caused some Manhattan Project scientists to suggest that the d(t,n) cross sections are significantly higher than those for deuteron-on-deuterium fusion and led to the first measurement of d(3He,p) and d(t,n) cross sections in 1943. Here, we have used modern cross sections and stopping powers to estimate the expected numbers of high-energy protons associated with in-flight d(t,n) reactions in Ruhlig’s experiment. Our estimate is four orders of magnitude lower than Ruhlig’s observed rate. However, the number of high-energy protons in Ruhlig’s experiment can be obtained via simulation if the protons are assumed to have been emitted by secondary in-flight d(3He,p) reactions, with various plausible assumptions about the experimental geometry and target-backing thickness. Our calculations demonstrate that quantitative information about the fusion of A = 3 ions with deuterium could have been obtained via experiments similar to Ruhlig’s well in advance of the advent of 3He ion and triton beams in 1943. This opportunity seems to have been missed.