ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2025
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40 discuss the future of nuclear
Seven members of the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 came together on March 4 to discuss the current state of nuclear energy and what the future might hold for science, industry, and the public in terms of nuclear development.
To hear more insights from this talented group of young professionals, watch the “40 Under 40 Roundtable: Perspectives from Nuclear’s Rising Stars” on the ANS website.
Max Aker, Michael Sturm, Florian Priester, Simon Tirolf, Dominic Batzler, Robin Größle, Alexander Marsteller, Marco Röllig, Magnus Schlösser
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 80 | Number 3 | May 2024 | Pages 303-310
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2023.2214695
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The KArlsruhe TRItium Neutrino (KATRIN) collaboration aims to determine the neutrino mass with a sensitivity of 0.2 eV/c2 (90% confidence level). This will be achieved by probing the end-point region of the β-electron spectrum of gaseous tritium with an electrostatic spectrometer. A gold-coated stainless steel disk defines the reference potential for high-precision neutrino mass measurement, and it terminates the β-electron flux as the physical boundary of the tritium source. This so-called rear wall is exposed to tritium, which leads to adsorption and absorption. This in turn leads to systematic uncertainties for the neutrino mass measurements that need to be understood and mitigated. In maintenance phases, during which the gaseous tritium source was emptied (<10−5 of nominal gas density), the activity that accumulated on the rear wall during normal operation was monitored using beta-induced X-ray spectrometry (BIXS) and direct observation of emitted β electrons with a silicon detector. Dependency of the observed activity increase on the integral tritium throughput was investigated and found to converge from limited exponential growth to continuous linear growth. This paper gives an overview of the results that were obtained using several methods of in situ decontamination of the rear wall while continuously monitoring the activity. The decontamination methods included heating during continuous evacuation; flushing the system with nitrogen, deuterium, or air with residual humidity at different pressures; and illumination of the rear wall with ultraviolet (UV) light. These well-known methods led to only a small (15%) decrease in the observed activity. However, a decrease of the surface activity by three orders of magnitude in less than 1 week was achieved by combination of different methods using UV light, a heated surface, and a low (5 to 100 mbar) pressure of air inside the chamber, leading to the production of highly reactive ozone. This proved to be by far the most efficient method, drastically reducing the contribution of the rear wall surface activity to the β spectrum of the gaseous source.