ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Akio Komori, Tomohiro Morisaki, Suguru Masuzaki, Mamoru Shoji, Nobuyoshi Ohyabu, Hiroshi Yamada, Kenji Tanaka, Kazuo Kawahata, Kazumichi Narihara, Shigeru Morita, Byron Jay Peterson, Ryuichi Sakamoto, Satoru Sakakibara, Osamu Motojima, LHD Experimental Group, Hajime Suzuki
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 46 | Number 1 | July 2004 | Pages 167-174
Technical Paper | Stellarators | doi.org/10.13182/FST04-A552
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A local island divertor (LID) experiment has begun in the Large Helical Device (LHD) to demonstrate improved plasma confinement, and fundamental LID functions were demonstrated in the sixth experimental campaign in 2002-2003. It was clearly shown that when an m/n = 1/1 island is generated by adding a resonant perturbation field to the LHD magnetic configuration, the particle flow is guided along the island separatrix to the backside of the island, where carbon plates are located on a divertor head. The particles recycled there are pumped out efficiently so that the line-averaged core plasma density is reduced by a factor of ~2 at the same gas puff rate, compared with non-LID discharges. Obvious improvement of the global plasma confinement was, however, not observed yet, because the discharge could not be optimized, due to a large amount of outgas from the divertor head to the core plasma. The size of the divertor head was found to be larger than the optimum one; hence, the core plasma impacted slightly on the core plasma-facing portion of the divertor head with which the core plasma was not expected to collide.