ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
NN Asks: What did you learn from ANS’s Nuclear 101?
Mike Harkin
When ANS first announced its new Nuclear 101 certificate course, I was excited. This felt like a course tailor-made for me, a transplant into the commercial nuclear world. I enrolled for the inaugural session held in November 2024, knowing it was going to be hard (this is nuclear power, of course)—but I had been working on ramping up my knowledge base for the past year, through both my employer and at a local college.
The course was a fast-and-furious roller-coaster ride through all the key components of the nuclear power industry, in one highly challenging week. In fact, the challenges the students experienced caught even the instructors by surprise. Thankfully, the shared intellectual stretch we students all felt helped us band together to push through to the end.
We were all impressed with the quality of the instructors, who are some of the top experts in the field. We appreciated not only their knowledge base but their support whenever someone struggled to understand a concept.
Felipe S. Novais, Nicholas R. Brown, G. Ivan Maldonado
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 79 | Number 8 | November 2023 | Pages 961-972
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2022.2161263
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents a parametric study of the Fusion Energy System Studies-Fusion Nuclear Science Facility’s (FNSF’s) tritium breeding performance for several solid breeder concepts, neutron multiplying materials, and blanket materials, assuming volume fractions based on the most recent FNSF design as a realistically representative fusion facility. In this study, we initially surveyed the tritium breeding ratio (TBR) of several solid breeder concepts by employing a simplified but efficient one-dimensional (1-D) infinite cylinder reduced-order model (ROM). Parametric studies were performed with the ROMs for the full range of breeder-to-multiplier ratios to identify the optimum mixture compositions for each breeder type that would lead to a maximum TBR.
These optimized breeder-multiplier combinations were then homogenized with FNSF blanket component materials to estimate their impacts on the TBR. Subsequently, as a validation step for the optimal designs, TBR calculations were performed using a more realistic modified 1-D ROM with inner and outer breeding regions, as well as with a fully detailed 22.5-deg three-dimensional (3-D) sector of the FNSF to assess the impact of geometry details on the TBR. The differences between the two 1-D models were negligible, while the ROMs were able to correctly predict trends and identify the maximum and minimum TBR cases, as well as show consistent biases relative to the results produced by the full 3-D, 22.5-deg sector for specific breeder/multiplier combinations.
Solid breeder concepts such as , , and outperformed all others in this study in terms of TBR performance when combined with all the neutron multiplier materials selected. An underlying goal of this study was to develop and improve rapid and reliable ROMs to aid designers during parametric optimizations of highly complex and computationally expensive fusion models.
