ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Argonne research aims to improve nuclear fuel recycling and metal recovery
Servis
Scientists at Argonne National Laboratory are investigating a used nuclear fuel recycling technology that could lead to a scaled-down and more efficient approach to metal recovery, according to a recent news article from the lab. The research, led by Argonne radiochemist Anna Servis with funding from the Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E), could have an impact beyond the nuclear fuel cycle and improve other high-value metal processing, such as rare earth recovery, according to Argonne.
The research: Servis’s work is being carried out under ARPA-E’s CURIE (Converting UNF Radioisotopes Into Energy) program. The specific project—Radioisotope Capture Intensification Using Rotating Packed Bed Contactors—started in 2023 and is scheduled to end in January 2026.
Alex Aimetta, Nicolò Abrate, Sandra Dulla, Antonio Froio
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 78 | Number 4 | May 2022 | Pages 275-290
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2021.2003151
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutronic modeling of fusion machines requires a detailed representation of their complex geometry in order to properly evaluate various parameters of interest such as energy deposition and tritium production in the breeding blanket. In this work, the neutronics of the Affordable, Robust, Compact (ARC) fusion reactor is modeled with the Monte Carlo particle transport code Serpent developed at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland as an alternative to other, more established, tools in the fusion community such as the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP) code. The tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and the power deposited by neutrons and photons inside the breeding blanket of ARC are evaluated. Considerations related to activation of materials and to neutron shielding are not taken into account. As a first step, estimations have been obtained adopting a spatially uniform neutron source inside the plasma chamber. A second set of calculations has been performed considering a nonuniform source that takes into account a more realistic neutron generation distribution, with higher values at the center of the plasma and reduced rates toward the plasma edge. The results obtained with Serpent have been compared with available literature values for the TBR and the power deposition, confirming that Serpent can be considered a suitable alternative code for the neutronic analysis of fusion reactors like ARC. The TBR presented in this paper (1.0853) is in good agreement with the value found in the literature, with a relative difference of 0.49%. The total power deposition has a maximum relative difference of 12% for the components of interest in the present work.