ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Christmas Night
Twas the night before Christmas when all through the houseNo electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged in by the chimney with careWith the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
R. M. Mayo
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | December 1996 | Pages 1326-1331
Innovative Approaches to Fusion Energy | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A11963132
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As a member of the compact toroidal class of magnetic fusion devices, the spheromak [Nucl. Fusion 19, 489 (1979)] offers substantial advantage as a fusion reactor concept over larger, more complicated, and more costly re-entrant devices like the tokamak. The compact and simply closed geometry affording high energy density, the inherent diverted nature of the magnetic topology, the force free condition μ0j(r) = ƛ(ϕ)B(r) nature of the spheromak equilibrium minimizing external coil requirements and stresses, and the possibility of Ohmic ignition resulting from the majority of confining fields generated by internal plasma currents in the spheromak, are a few of the more prominent advantages that represent substantial improvement over conventional magnetic fusion reactor designs. Further, recent successes in improving confinement parameters (Te ~ 400eV, Ti ~ 1keV, ne ~ 3 × 1014cm-3, B ~ 1T) have renewed the interest in advancing this concept to a proof-of-principle, reactor prototype stage.
Here we extend the initial work by Fowler, et al. [Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 16, 91 (1994)] indicating the possibility of Ohmic ignition in spheromaks, to a two fluid model that includes direct ion heating through turbulent Taylor relaxation mechanisms. The contribution to direct ion heating through this non-Ohmic magnetic dissipation, and confinement scaling are quantified through comparison with the latest results from the gun driven Compact Torus eXperiment (CTX) [Phys. Fluids B 2, 1342 (1990)] spheromak. We realize good agreement between experimentally measured plasma parameters and our model predictions. Extrapolation to an ignition class experiment is examined indicating the possibility of reaching these conditions by gun driven Ohmic heating alone, and illustrating the merits of direct ion heating on facilitating approach to ignition. Differences between classical (no direct ion heating) and direct ion heating cases are emphasized. Conservative confinement estimates are used throughout.