ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
M. Yoshida, T. Cho, M. Hirata, S. Nagashima, H. Ito, J. Kohagura, K. Yatsu, S. Miyoshi
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 43 | Number 1 | January 2003 | Pages 289-291
Diagnostics | doi.org/10.13182/FST03-A11963617
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In tandem-mirror experiments, plasma-confining potentials produced by electron-cyclotron heatings (ECH) play one of the most critical roles in the improvement of simple-mirror plasma confinement. For the observations of spatially resolved ion spectrum distributions require ion-sensitive and reproducible rigid detector-array units from a practical viewpoint. These data are, in turn, physically of importance for plasma confinement investigations including potential effects on plasma confinement as well as transport analysis in relation to the potential profiles. From these motivations, the relation of spatial distributions of ion-confining potentials ɸc. and end-loss-ion fluxes IELA is investigated by the use of newly designed ion-energy-spectrometer arrays installed in both end regions of GAMMA 10. Axisymmetric profiles of ɸc are found to have a good correlation with axisymmetric plugging distributions in IELA. These are consistently interpreted in terms of the Pastukhov theory of the relation between ɸc and IELA. For these axisymmetric plasmas, particle-balance calculations show ignorable radial-loss-ion fluxes I⊥ as compared to IELA. This result (i.e. IELA>>I⊥ is consistent with the assumption of the Pastukhov theory in which the axial particle loss alone is taken into account.