ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Jeffrey A. Crowell, James P. Blanchard
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 39 | Number 2 | March 2001 | Pages 434-438
Advanced Designs | doi.org/10.13182/FST01-A11963274
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A model of the induced currents and resultant electromagnetic forces and stresses during a disruption event in the ARIES-RS tokamak design is presented. Like many other power reactor concepts, the ARIES-RS has a modular design consisting of toroidally segmented internal structures to limit disruption induced currents and facilitate maintenance. During a disruption, currents driven in these structures cross the large toroidal magnetic field producing substantial electromagnetic forces.
To consider these effects, a transient three-dimensional electromagnetic finite element model of the ARIES-RS device was created, implemented by the commercial code ANSYS. The same code was used for dynamic structural analysis.
The model includes all major components (the first wall, blankets, divertor plates, stabilizing shells, vacuum vessel, shields) electromagnetically coupled together. The magnets are assumed to remain energized during the disruption. The plasma current decay is prescribed, not coupled with the current in the structure. Halo currents and and vertical displacement events, which may produce larger forces than found in this study, are not considered.
The results illuminate important design tradeoffs. For a centered fast plasma current quench, the outboard first wall/blanket modules were found to experience the most severe loading. Current in the sidewalls generate forces that produce large torques on these structures. Supports are needed to react these loads; however, thermal stress considerations drive designs toward a first wall with a compliant support system. Thus, supports needed to reinforce against disruption loads can lower the maximum permissible heat flux on the first wall. Further, electromagnetic pressure on the first wall requires a factor of two reduction in the coolant channel width in some regions, resulting in higher pumping power.
Extension of the results to other modular tokamak designs is discussed.
Color versions of the figures are available on the world wide web at http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/disrupt or by contacting the authors.