ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Y-K. M. Peng, D. J. Strickler, S. K. Borowski, W. R. Hamilton, R. L. Reid, (ORNL), J. R. Haines, V. D. Lee, (MDAC), G. E. Gorker, S. S. Kalsi, B. W. Riemer, E. C. Selcow, (GAC), G. R. Dalton, (U. of Florida), G. T. Bussell, (S&W), J. B. Miller, (U. of Tennessee)
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 338-343
Power Reactor and Next-Generation Studies | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A40067
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Initial assessments of ignition devices based on the spherical torus concept1 suggest that an ignition spherical torus (IST) can be highly cost-effective and exceptionally small in unit size. Assuming advanced methods of current drive and confinement and beta scalings with plasma current, a D-T IST with a toroidal field of 2 to 3 T is estimated to have a major radius ranging from 1 m to 1.6 m, and a fusion power less than 60 MW. For the nominal IST (at 2 T and 1.6 m), the direct cost of the nuclear island is estimated to be about $120 M with a total direct cost about $340 M in mid-1984 dollars based on the Fusion Engineering Design Center (FEDC) cost algorithm2. For ISTs with higher field and smaller size (e.g., at 3 T and 1 m), further reductions of the cost of the nuclear island are estimated. In case of confinement scaling with the plasma size only, strong plasma paramagnetism (self-generated magnetic field) in the spherical torus may still serve to compensate for the projected confinement shortfall. Because of the modest field strength, only conventional engineering approaches are needed in the IST concepts, leading to dramatic engineering simplifications in comparison with the conventional high-field ignition designs3. A free-standing TF coil/vacuum vessel structure is assessed to be feasible and relatively independent of the shield structure and poloidal field coils. The direct cost of this “stand-alone” torus of the nominal IST is estimated to be $70 M. These highly attractive projections of the IST result directly from a combination of the possible exceptional features of the spherical torus plasma4: high beta, low beta poloidal, naturally large elongation, high plasma current, strong paramagnetism, and tokamak-like confinement, which also place the spherical torus in a plasma regime distinct from tokamaks of conventional aspect ratios. Experimental testing of the viability of the spherical torus concept is suggested.