ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2025
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40 discuss the future of nuclear
Seven members of the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 came together on March 4 to discuss the current state of nuclear energy and what the future might hold for science, industry, and the public in terms of nuclear development.
To hear more insights from this talented group of young professionals, watch the “40 Under 40 Roundtable: Perspectives from Nuclear’s Rising Stars” on the ANS website.
Y-K. M. Peng, D. J. Strickler, S. K. Borowski, W. R. Hamilton, R. L. Reid, (ORNL), J. R. Haines, V. D. Lee, (MDAC), G. E. Gorker, S. S. Kalsi, B. W. Riemer, E. C. Selcow, (GAC), G. R. Dalton, (U. of Florida), G. T. Bussell, (S&W), J. B. Miller, (U. of Tennessee)
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 338-343
Power Reactor and Next-Generation Studies | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A40067
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Initial assessments of ignition devices based on the spherical torus concept1 suggest that an ignition spherical torus (IST) can be highly cost-effective and exceptionally small in unit size. Assuming advanced methods of current drive and confinement and beta scalings with plasma current, a D-T IST with a toroidal field of 2 to 3 T is estimated to have a major radius ranging from 1 m to 1.6 m, and a fusion power less than 60 MW. For the nominal IST (at 2 T and 1.6 m), the direct cost of the nuclear island is estimated to be about $120 M with a total direct cost about $340 M in mid-1984 dollars based on the Fusion Engineering Design Center (FEDC) cost algorithm2. For ISTs with higher field and smaller size (e.g., at 3 T and 1 m), further reductions of the cost of the nuclear island are estimated. In case of confinement scaling with the plasma size only, strong plasma paramagnetism (self-generated magnetic field) in the spherical torus may still serve to compensate for the projected confinement shortfall. Because of the modest field strength, only conventional engineering approaches are needed in the IST concepts, leading to dramatic engineering simplifications in comparison with the conventional high-field ignition designs3. A free-standing TF coil/vacuum vessel structure is assessed to be feasible and relatively independent of the shield structure and poloidal field coils. The direct cost of this “stand-alone” torus of the nominal IST is estimated to be $70 M. These highly attractive projections of the IST result directly from a combination of the possible exceptional features of the spherical torus plasma4: high beta, low beta poloidal, naturally large elongation, high plasma current, strong paramagnetism, and tokamak-like confinement, which also place the spherical torus in a plasma regime distinct from tokamaks of conventional aspect ratios. Experimental testing of the viability of the spherical torus concept is suggested.