ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
M.Z. Youssef, Y. Watanabe, M. Abdou, M. Nakagawa, T. Mori, K. Kosako, T. Nakamura
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 15 | Number 2 | March 1989 | Pages 1299-1308
Blanket Nucleonics Experiment | doi.org/10.13182/FST89-A39869
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several fusion-oriented integral experiments were performed in Phase II of the U.S./JAERI Collaborative Program on Fusion Neutronics where the geometrical configurations and source condition closely simulate the incident spectrum in fusion reactors. The main objective of the program is to estimate the uncertainties involved in predicting tritium breeding rate in Li2O and other neutronics parameters in fusion blankets that include engineering features (i.e., first wall, multiplier). In Phase II, the Li2O test assembly is placed on one end of a Li2CO3 enclosure that houses the D-T neutron source. Predicted local and integrated tritium production rates (TPR) from 6Li(T6), 7Li(T7) and natural lithium (TN) were compared to measurements in various configurations that included reference, first wall and beryllium multiplier experiments (Phase IIA) in addition to repeating these experiments with a FW/Be layer covering the interior surface of the Li2CO3 enclosure (Phase IIB). Other neutronics parameters that included source characterization by foil measurements, in-system reaction rates, and in-system spectrum measurements were also analyzed. The analyses were carried out independently by both parties using various 3-D Monte Carlo codes and 2-D discrete ordinates codes and data libraries. The results of the analyses are reported in this paper with emphasis placed on the impact of the beryllium data on the discrepancies found between predictions and measurements.