ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Cris W. Barnes, Alvin R. Larson, A. L. Roquemore
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 1 | September 1996 | Pages 63-72
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A30763
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The most accurate determination of neutron yields from fusion reactors maybe obtained from neutron activation measurements of elemental foils. On the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR), a re-entrant irradiation end has been installed to provide a low-scattering environment close to the plasma for neutron activation measurements. The ratio of energy-dependent fluence to total fusion yield is calculated using a fully three-dimensional Monte Carlo calculation with the Monte Carlo code for neutron and photon transport (MCNP). Corrections to the “virgin” fluence from attenuation and scattering are only 10 to 20% for deuterium-tritium (D-T) reactions and 30 to 40% for deuterium-deuterium reactions. A total 1-sigma accuracy of ±8% is achieved for D-T neutron yields over a wide dynamic range. This paper documents the response coefficients (hits per source neutron, where hits are activated nuclei per target nuclei) for use by the neutron activation system on TFTR; describes the possible systematic corrections needed (such as major radial variations or the impact of ion temperature on reactions with high-energy thresholds); and estimates uncertainties in the response coefficients. Results from in situ use of a D-T neutron generator are also analyzed using the MCNP modeling as an approximate benchmarking experiment; only 20% accuracy in the comparison is possible because of poor counting statistics in the calibration experiment.