ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
E. S. Hotston
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 26 | Number 3 | November 1994 | Pages 203-221
Technical Paper | Divertor System | doi.org/10.13182/FST94-A30323
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The exhaust modeling program for a fusion reactor based on a tokamak carried out for Next European Torus (NET)/International Tokamak Reactor (INTOR)/International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in the years 1982 to 1991 during which the author was involved is open to criticism on at least two counts. The first is that although in general there are at least two plasma configurations in the divertor that balance the upstream plasma pressure and power flow into the divertor, only one solution was accepted. The other solutions were assumed to be nonexistent or unimportant. The second count is that the possibility was not considered that atoms backscattered from the plasma could deposit power in the divertor target; inclusion of this process would have enlarged the domain in which multiple solutions are important. In particular, a plasma in which the temperatures are low appears as a possible solution. Here the atomic and molecular properties of the fuel, which vary quite rapidly with the electron temperature, are very important, so obtaining this solution by an implicit procedure is difficult. The two-dimensional modeling programs referred to earlier were carried out with the use of the Braams plasma transport code, which relies on a “strongly implicit method” for its updating. Examination of this code shows that the techniques used to stabilize it are incompatible with the procedures required to find the low-temperature solution. These objections would remain in the case where a Monte Carlo code is used to trace the fate of the neutrals recycled in the divertor. Recent modeling work based on Monte Carlo codes suggests that the plasma temperatures of the higher temperature solutions are likely to be greater than previously thought. Thus, resolution of the problem of finding the lower temperature solutions becomes important.