ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
K.M. Nikbin, G. A. Webster, N. Mitchell
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1905-1908
Magnetic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29997
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A single rectangular conductor jacket, including the surrounding insulation, has been modelled using finite element computational techniques. Such jackets are typical of the situation in a force flow cooled superconducting coil, where the jacket encloses the current carrying cable and the liquid helium coolant. Elliptical shaped cracks in the jacket have been included in the model to evaluate the stress intensity factors at the crack tip for three crack sizes at three different locations. Results using 3D finite elements are presented for a typical semi-elliptical surface crack in a single conductor jacket under tensile loading. It has been found that mesh and element sizes contribute to the variation in the values of the stress intensity factors calculated but that the relative accuracy of the results is generally within ±5%.