ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
2027 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
October 31–November 4, 2027
Washington, DC|The Westin Washington, DC Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2024
Latest News
Disney World should have gone nuclear
There is extra significance to the American Nuclear Society holding its annual meeting in Orlando, Florida, this past week. That’s because in 1967, the state of Florida passed a law allowing Disney World to build a nuclear power plant.
D. B. Montgomery
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1893-1897
Magnetic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29995
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ITER Magnetics R&D plan developed during the Conceptual Design Activity identified the need to build both central solenoid (CS) and toroidal field (TF) model coils. In the CDA plan both model sets were circular. The CS model coil would have an inner diameter of 2 m, a field of 13 T and no case, whereas the TF model coils would have a 4 m diameter, a field of 11 T field, and a surrounding case. The U.S. has proposed instead that the TF model coil be down sized and made noncircular, so that a 2 m x 3.5 m model can be combined with the CS model coils, still allowing full simulation of the ITER TF stresses. This smaller assembly of coils, which would use full-scale conductors, would be less expensive to build, and would be more suitable for conducting an extensive set of cyclic extended performance tests. To compensate for the loss of large coil fabrication with the down-sizing of the TF model coil, the U.S. has propose that a full-scale ITER TF magnet double pancake, or two layers of a nested shell concept, be fabricated from production conductor, and that the coil element and its structure be cold tested in a prototypical “Q/A Production Test.”