ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2025
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40 discuss the future of nuclear
Seven members of the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 came together on March 4 to discuss the current state of nuclear energy and what the future might hold for science, industry, and the public in terms of nuclear development.
To hear more insights from this talented group of young professionals, watch the “40 Under 40 Roundtable: Perspectives from Nuclear’s Rising Stars” on the ANS website.
F. Najmabadi,1 R. W. Conn,1, the ARIES Team:, C. G. Bathke,5 C. B. Baxi,2 L. Bromberg,6 J. Brooks,3 E. T. Cheng,11 F. Davis,7 D. A. Ehst,3 L. A. El-Guebaly,10 G. A. Emmert,10 T. J. Dolan,4 M. Z. Hasan,1 A. Hassanein,3 J. S. Herring,4 J. A. Holmes,7 T. Hua,3 A. Hull,3 S. C. Jardin,8 C. Kessel,8 H. Y. Khater,10 R. A. Krakowski,5 J. A. Leuer,2 D. C. Lousteau,7 R. Mattis,3 T-K. Mau,1 B. W. McQuillan,2 B. Picologlou,3 F. A. Puhn,2 J. F. Santarius,10 M. Sawan,10 J. Schultz,6 K. R. Schultz,2 S. Sharafat,1 L. Snead,9 D. Steiner,9 D. J. Strickler,7 I. N. Sviatoslavsky,10 D-K. Sze,3 M. Valenti,9 K. A. Werley,5, C. P. C. Wong2
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1721-1728
Magnetic Fusion Reactor and Systems Studies | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29970
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ARIES research program is a multi-institutional effort to develop several visions of tokamak reactors with enhanced economic, safety, and environmental features. Four ARIES visions are currently planned for the ARIES program. The ARIES-I design is a DT-burning reactor based on “modest” extrapolations from the present tokamak physics database and relies on either existing technology or technology for which trends are already in place, often in programs outside fusion. The ARIES-III study focuses on the potential of tokamaks to operate with D-3He fuel system as an alternative to deuterium and tritium. Two major cost items in the ARIES-I reactor are those associated with the magnet system and the current-drive system and recirculating power. Theoretical studies of the second MHD stability regime has been on-going in order to increase the toroidal beta (reduce the magnet cost) as compared to the first-stability regime. Recent analyses indicate that because second MHD stable plasmas have a high poloidal beta, the bootstrap current is high and can exceed the equilibrium plasma current. Therefore, the ARIES-II/-IV activity, therefore, has focused on second-stability equilibria in which ∼ 100% of plasma current is produced by the bootstrap current. These equilibria have only moderate toroidal beta (∼ 4% to 6%) but the current-drive power (and cost) is small. Parametric system studies have confirmed that by operating in the second-stability regime with the constraint of ∼100% bootstrap current, the COE of ARIES-II and ARIES-IV designs are ∼ 25% lower than that of ARIES-I. The ARIES-II and ARIES-IV designs have the same fusion plasma but different fusion-power-core designs. The ARIES-II reactor uses liquid lithium as the coolant and tritium breeder and vanadium alloy as the structural material in order to study the potential of low-activation metallic blankets. The ARIES-IV reactor uses helium as the coolant, a solid tritium-breeding material, and silicon carbide composite as the structural material in order to achieve the safety and environmental characteristic of fusion. In this paper we describe the trade-off leading to the optimum regime of operation for the ARIES-II and ARIES-IV second-stability reactors and review the engineering design of the fusion power cores.