ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Winfried Kernbichler
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 4 | July 1992 | Pages 2297-2306
Technical Paper | Special Issue on D-He Fusion / D-3He/Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The intrinsic potential of a field-reversed configuration (FRC) for high-beta operation (beta values in the range of 50 to 100%) stimulates much interest in this device as an attractive candidate for a compact fusion reactor with high power density. Several additional benefits, e.g., the cylindrical geometry of the concept, the simplicity of the magnetic system, the simply connected plasma, the low synchrotron radiation, the divertor action of the open field lines, and the possibility for direct energy conversion of the charged-particle flow, justify a closer look at the benefits and problems of FRCs. The emphasis here is on operation with D-3He fuel under reactor-relevant conditions, whereas deuterium-tritium (D-T) is taken as a reference case. The reasons for that choice are that (a) D-3He offers intrinsic advantages over D-T in neutron production and radioactive inventory and (b) the high-beta regime of an FRC matches ideally some of the requirements for D-3He operation. A steady-state version of an FRC is considered to be more attractive than its pulsed counterpart. Frequent startup to high temperatures would be particularly detrimental for D-3He, where startup scenarios seem to rely either on the transition from D-T to D-3He, with unavoidable strong tritium contamination, or on high-power neutral beam injection.