ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DNFSB spots possible bottleneck in Hanford’s waste vitrification
Workers change out spent 27,000-pound TSCR filter columns and place them on a nearby storage pad during a planned outage in 2023. (Photo: DOE)
While the Department of Energy recently celebrated the beginning of hot commissioning of the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which has begun immobilizing the site’s radioactive tank waste in glass through vitrification, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has reported a possible bottleneck in waste processing. According to the DNFSB, unless current systems run efficiently, the issue could result in the interruption of operations at the WTP’s Low-Activity Waste Facility, where waste vitrification takes place.
During operations, the LAW Facility will process an average of 5,300 gallons of tank waste per day, according to Bechtel, the contractor leading design, construction, and commissioning of the WTP. That waste is piped to the facility after being treated by Hanford’s Tanks Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which filters undissolved solid material and removes cesium from liquid waste.
According to a November 7 activity report by the DNFSB, the TSCR system may not be able to produce waste feed fast enough to keep up with the LAW Facility’s vitrification rate.
M. R. Fox, A. B. Hull, T. F. Kassner
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1619-1628
Material and Tritium | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29573
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Susceptibility of Types 316NG, 316, and 304 stainless steels (SS) to stress corrosion cracking was investigated in slow-strain-rate tests (SSRTs) in oxygenated water that simulates important parameters anticipated in first-wall/blanket systems. The water chemistry was based on a computer code that yielded the nominal concentrations of radiolytic species produced in an aqueous environment under conditions expected in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Actual SSRTs were performed in a less benign, more oxidizing reference environment at temperatures of 52 to 150°C. Predominantly ductile fracture was observed in Type 316NG and nonsensitized Types 316 and 304 SS SSRT specimens that were strained to failure in a reference ITER water chemistry. The failure behavior of Type 304 SS specimens, heat-treated to yield sensitization values of 2, 3, and 20 Coulomb (C)/cm2 by the electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation technique, demonstrated that the degree of sensitization dramatically affected susceptibility to intergranular stress corrosion cracking. Ranking for resistance to stress corrosion cracking in simulated ITER water by electron microscopy and SSRT parameters, i.e., failure time, ultimate strength, total elongation, and stress ratio, is 304 SS (EPR = 20<2 C/cm2)<316NG SS.