ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Mohamed A. Abdou
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1439-1451
ITER | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29544
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
ITER is envisioned to operate in two phases: the Physics Phase, ∼ 6 yrs, is devoted to the physics issues followed by the Technology Phase, ∼ 8 yrs, used mainly for technology testing. The nuclear testing program of ITER is intended to provide powerful, albeit partial, demonstration of the ultimate potential of a fusion blanket. The ITER test group, which consists of a number of ITER designers and experts from the home teams concerned with the long-term development of fusion technology, has carried out several tasks, including: 1) Definition of the testing requirements on the major parameters of ITER; 2) Definition of the test program (time-space matrix and priorities of tests); 3) Engineering design of test modules; 4) Ancillary equipment to support test module operation and 5) Allocation of available test space among countries. Recommended ITER parameters are: neutron wall load ∼ 1 MW/M2, lifetime neutron fluence ∼ 3 MW y/m2 and several periods of continuous operation (∼ 100% availability with back to back pulses or steady state) of ∼ 1 to 2 weeks each. The requirements on plasma burn and dwell times are quantified. Steady state operation is a desirable goal. If this goal cannot be achieved, a burn time of ∼ 1 to 3 hours, depending on the breeder temperature, is needed for tritium release tests in solid breeders. The requirements for ancillary equipment outside the torus, required to support the test modules (e.g., heat rejection systems, tritium processing, etc.) are extensive and they substantially influence the overall design engineering. The space available for testing in ITER is not sufficient for 4 complete programs (one for each country). An effective strategy for allocation of test ports among countries is being evolved. It involves a combination of collaboration on some tests, and allocation of testing space and time by party.