ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
Shigeo Numata, Yasuhiko Fujii, Makoto Okamoto
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 466-472
Technical Paper | Safety Environmental Aspect | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29387
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Cleanup of tritiated water in typical reactor-size concrete enclosures is simulated taking into account the soaking of the tritiated water into the concrete. For an enclosure made of concrete with ordinary porosity, the “soaking effect” has little effect on the cleanup time for releases with tritium concentrations of <1 × 108 Bq/m3. If the concrete porosity is reduced to 0.03, the soaking effect has little effect on the cleanup time for a tritium concentration of up to 1 × 109 Bq/m3. An optimum flow rate of between 1 × 104 and 1.5 × 104 m3/h for the tritium removal system minimizes the costs of removal system equipment and facility downtime for releases with a concentration >5 × 108 Bq/m3 in a typical reactor-size enclosure. Estimated total costs to complete the cleanup within 48 and 72 h with these flow rates are within 1.3 times of the minimum total costs. The estimated total costs for a cleanup time of 48 h are comparable to those for a cleanup time of 72 h.