ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Kurt Borrass, William R. Spears
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 14 | Number 1 | July 1988 | Pages 228-245
Technical Paper | Net Overview | doi.org/10.13182/FST88-A25161
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Scoping studies for the Next European Torus (NET) using the SUPERCOIL system code are described. Capital-cost-optimized devices satisfying constraints imposed on stresses/strains, fields, access, etc., are compared. The main objective is to determine the impact of design characteristics, performance objectives, and underlying plasma physics assumptions on the parameters and cost of NET. The background against which the main parameters of NET have been chosen is developed and illustrated by the NET study points used during the conceptual design phase. Supporting studies extrapolating NET design and physics assumptions to DEMO and power reactors are performed to allow the reactor relevance of the physics performance and testing program of NET to be justified.