ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Jean-François Jaeger, Donald J. Dudziak, Giorgio Friedrich, Walter V. Green, Peter Groner, Max Huggenberger, Peter Köhler, P. Marmy, Sandro Pelloni, Jiri Stepanek, Ulrich Stiefel, Peter Stiller, M. Victoria
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 364-379
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25069
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A hybrid blanket for a reversed-field pinch (RFP) reactor is presented for breeding 233U from thorium. This study focuses on the shell/blanket design and assumes a plasma like that used by Culham Laboratory (CL) in its designs. The 233U bred helps the important neutron economy and allows the tritium breeding ratio to be 0.96 at beginning of life for a mean of 1.06 for a 9 MW·yr/m2 burnup. A thick conducting shell is assumed for discharge stability and field reversal. This need for a good conductor requires that only pure copper or aluminum or alloys thereof be used. Two designs were investigated, one with a pure copper first wall/shell, the other with an aluminum alloy. In these designs 3.4% of the thorium is converted to 233U. This corresponds to 18.3 tonnes U in both cases for average thermal powers of 4590 and 4450 MW, respectively, at a wall loading of 2.2 MW/m2 during the burn phase. The breeding rates of 233U are, respectively, 0.66 and 0.69 kg/MW·yr, representing ratios of fission events per bred atom of 0.26 and 0.22, which is naturally better than in the fast breeder. In both designs the low metallurgie temperature limit means the large amount of power deposited on and in the shell is not attractive thermodynamically. The resulting large temperature differences in the shell cause high mechanical stresses. The design as it stands is not feasible from the point of view of radiation damage to materials. The pure metal copper shell swells too much (life limit 1.3 to 2 MW·yr/m2), the transmutations limit the electrical life to 3 MW·yr/m2, and low alloys of copper have not yet been irradiated tofluences sufficient for consideration. The aluminum alloy becomes brittle. This and low cycle fatigue each limit the life to 4.5 MW·yr/m2. Further thoughts at CL show that the RFP should work with a thinner shell as well; this would considerably reduce the thermal stresses in the shell and increase its lifetime sufficiently.