ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
The DOE’s plan for AI in NRC licensing
The Department of Energy announced the completion of a proof-of-concept demonstration of the use of Everstar’s AI tool to generate chapter 5 of an NRC license application from preliminary safety documents.
The 208-page document was created by the AI tool in approximately one day. According to the DOE, it would typically take a team of people between four and six weeks to complete this work.
Wayne R. Meier
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 3 | Number 3 | May 1983 | Pages 385-391
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A20862
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Monte Carlo neutronics calculations have been carried out to compare the effects of chamber ports on the neutron leakage and blanket performance for lithium and lead-lithium blankets. A spherical chamber with diametrically opposed, conical penetrations through the blanket and a 14.1-MeV point source at its center is the basis for the comparison. The total neutron leakage through ports in a lithium blanket is about two times greater than one would estimate based on the solid angle fraction subtended by the holes. For a blanket comprised primarily of the lead-lithium eutectic, Pb83Li17, the leakage per deuterium-tritium neutron is about six times the subtended solid angle fraction. As a result of the enhanced neutron leakage, the tritium-breeding ratio and neutron energy deposited in the blanket decrease more rapidly than the loss of blanket coverage. For example, for a chamber in which the ports subtend 5% of the total solid angle, the tritium-breeding ratios are ∼s and ∼20% less than the results without ports for the lithium and Pb83Li17 blankets, respectively. The neutron energy deposited in the blanket decreases ∼7% for lithium and ∼14% for Pb83Li17 for the same 5% loss in blanket coverage.