ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2025
Latest News
Argonne’s METL gears up to test more sodium fast reactor components
Argonne National Laboratory has successfully swapped out an aging cold trap in the sodium test loop called METL (Mechanisms Engineering Test Loop), the Department of Energy announced April 23. The upgrade is the first of its kind in the United States in more than 30 years, according to the DOE, and will help test components and operations for the sodium-cooled fast reactors being developed now.
Don Steiner, Charles A. Flanagan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 3 | Number 1 | January 1983 | Pages 6-52
Overview | Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A20816
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
During 1981, the Fusion Engineering Design Center developed a baseline design for the Fusion Engineering Device (FED) called for in the U.S. Magnetic Fusion Energy Engineering Act of 1980. The device has a major radius of 5.0 m with a plasma minor radius of 1.3 m elongated by 1.6. Capability is provided for operating the toroidal field (TF) coils up to 10 T, but the bulk of the operations are designed for 8 T. At 8-T conditions, the fusion power is ∼180 MW (neutron wall loading ∼0.4 MW/m2) and a plasma Q of ∼5 is expected. At 10-T conditions, which are expected to be limited to ∼10% of the total operations, the fusion power is ∼450 MW (∼1.0 MW/m2) and ignition is expected. Maintenance and cost were the key considerations in developing the design. The plasma chamber is assembled by inserting ten shield sectors into a spool support structure. Ten TF coils (7.4- × 10.9-m bore) are employed and produce a 3.6-T field (8 T) or 4.6-T field (10 T) on axis. Options for the TF coils include superfluid-cooled NbTi, subcooled NbTi, and a hybrid coil consisting of both NbTi and Nb3Sn. The poloidal coil system incorporates both normal copper coils (inside the TF coils) and superconducting NbTi coils (outside the TF coils). Plasma bulk heating is accomplished using 50 MW of ion cyclotron resonance heating. Electron cyclotron resonance heating is used for startup assist. A mechanical pumped limiter, located at the bottom of the plasma chamber, establishes the plasma edge and is used to pump hydrogen and helium particles. The first wall consists of water-cooled stainless steel panels complemented with passively cooled graphite armor on the top and inboard walls and on each side of the limiter. The inboard shield is 60 cm thick and the outboard shield is 120 cm thick. Feasible solutions were developed for each of the major systems and subsystems of this FED design. However, key design issues remain, and if resolved could improve the overall design. This design and the supporting basis constitute a departure point for the initiation of a full conceptual design effort.
