ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NRC asks for comments on FY 2026 fees proposal
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is looking for feedback on its proposed rule for fees for fiscal year 2026, which begins October 1. The proposal was published in the March 12 Federal Register.
Based on the FY 2026 budget request because a full-year appropriation has not yet been enacted for the fiscal year, the proposed request is $971.5 million, an increase of $27.4 million from FY 2025.
L. Bromberg, J. H. Schultz, L. El-Guebaly, L. Waganer, ARIES Team
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 52 | Number 3 | October 2007 | Pages 422-426
Technical Paper | The Technology of Fusion Energy - Experimental Devices and Advanced Designs | doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1524
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The complexity of Compact Stellarator (CS) coils made from brittle A15 SC alloys results in a challenging design. Three options of manufacturing the ARIES-CS coils are discussed. The first two options use high performance Nb3Sn superconductor, one with the wind-and-react method, the second with react-and-wind. The magnet protection design philosophies are different for the two winding methods. Wind-and-react uses high conductor current with external dump, while react-and-wind uses low conductor current with internal dump. The use of non-uniform internal quench is explored as a means to minimizing the requirements for internal dump for the case of react-and-wind. Cooling of the superconductor is also fundamentally different in the two cases, as the hydraulic path of the react-and-wind option requires low velocity He in a sheathed Rutherford-like cable, cooled by a heat exchanger in accessible regions. In the third design option, HTS superconductors are deposited directly on the structure, minimizing conductor movement. Coil protection techniques will be described.