ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Christmas Night
Twas the night before Christmas when all through the houseNo electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged in by the chimney with careWith the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
A. Moro, A. Bruschi
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 52 | Number 2 | August 2007 | Pages 256-265
Technical Paper | Electron Cyclotron Wave Physics, Technology, and Applications - Part 1 | doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1505
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Launching systems that use in sequence more than one mirror to direct and focus electron cyclotron (EC) waves with a sufficient steering capability in relevant absorption regions of fusion plasmas may produce general astigmatic beams. The double curvature of a generic reflecting surface, even induced by deformation effects in quasi-optical systems that handle high power, is an additional source of general astigmatism. Describing the propagation of general astigmatic Gaussian beams is a necessary step in the optimization phase of a complex EC resonance heating (ECRH) launcher, since simple astigmatism treatment does not reproduce the main feature of these beams, whose spot and phase ellipse orientation changes with propagation even in free space. The correct orientation for both spot ellipse and phase ellipse is one of the input key parameters to perform realistic calculations with beam-tracing codes, which aim to characterize a launching system in terms of localized heating and current drive efficiency. In this work we describe the influence of double-curvature effects and deformations on beam propagation in terms of beam dimensions and directions. In particular, we present an application of the theory of general astigmatic Gaussian beam propagation in vacuum to the case of the remote steering option for the ITER ECRH upper launcher. In this option beams are found to be strongly astigmatic, with a major/minor axis ratio in relevant absorption regions ranging from 2.3 to 4.4 in the cases examined. Furthermore, the major axis of the resulting spot ellipses presents an orientation angle variation (from the last mirror to the expected absorption regions) ranging from 9.1 to 22.8 deg in the cases investigated. The final orientation is close to a vertical direction with respect to the equatorial plane of ITER.
