ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
D. H. Edgell, R. S. Craxton, L. M. Elasky, D. R. Harding, S. J. Verbridge, M. D. Wittman, W. Seka
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 51 | Number 4 | May 2007 | Pages 717-726
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1469
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Backlit optical shadowgraphy is the primary diagnostic for hydrogenic ice-layer characterization in cryogenic targets at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE). Reflection and refraction of light passing through the ice layer produce characteristic rings on the image. The position of the most prominent of the shadowgraph rings, known as the bright ring, can be resolved to ~0.1-pixel rms, corresponding to less than 0.2 m for typical target shadowgraphs. The LLE target characterization stations use two camera angles and target rotation to record target shadowgraphs from many different views (typically 48) and build a three-dimensional (3-D) topology of the ice layer. The standard method of bright-ring analysis using spherically symmetric ray-trace calculations to determine the ice surface is limited to mode numbers up to around [script l]max = 10 by gaps in the data and the effects of ice-layer asymmetries that invalidate the symmetric ray trace calculations. A 3-D ray-tracing model has been incorporated into the shadowgraph analysis. The result is a self-consistent determination of the hydrogen/vapor surface structure for cryogenic targets up to higher-mode numbers ([script l]max = 16). This reduces the standard deviation between the measured bright rings and those predicted for the 3-D ice surface (by 45% from 1.5 m to 0.8 m in the example shown).