ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Oren A. Wasson, Michael M. Meier, Kenneth C. Duvall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 2 | June 1982 | Pages 196-212
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20085
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The absolute 235U neutron-induced fission cross section has been measured at the U.S. National Bureau of Standards (NBS) 3-MV Van de Graaff Laboratory from 0.2- to 1.2-MeV neutron energy. The mass of the 235U contained in a large volume multiplated fission ionization chamber was measured relative to the NBS fissionable isotope mass standards. Pulsed beam time-of-flight techniques were used with neutrons from the 7Li(p, n)7 Be reaction while the neutron flux was monitored with a large plastic scintillator whose efficiency was both calculated and measured with the associated-particle technique. The cross sections, which were measured with a typical uncertainty of 2.3%, are ∼2% lower than the ENDF/B-V evaluation.